Soldiers safer in war than in peace

|

Power Line published an excellent essay on casualties in times of war and peace. Its key point: American soldiers are safer at war in Iraq than they were in previous peacetime years.

"...between 1983 and 1996, 18,006 American military personnel died accidentally in the service of their country. That death rate of 1,286 per year exceeds the rate of combat deaths in Iraq by a ratio of nearly two to one."

You'd never know that from reading, watching or listening to mainstream media in the U.S. For that matter, I didn't know it until now even from blogs.

"For Americans who do not seek out alternative news sources like this one, the war in Iraq is little but a succession of American casualties. The wonder is that so many Americans do, nevertheless, support it.

The sins of the news media in reporting on Iraq are mainly sins of omission. Not only do news outlets generally fail to report the progress that is being made, and often fail to put military operations into any kind of tactical or strategic perspective, they assiduously avoid talking about the overarching strategic reason for our involvement there: the Bush administration's conviction that the only way to solve the problem of Islamic terrorism, long term, is to help liberate the Arab countries so that their peoples' energies will be channelled into the peaceful pursuits of free enterprise and democracy, rather than into bizarre ideologies and terrorism."

Categories

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by mitm published on August 24, 2005 11:35 PM.

Information Reformation was the previous entry in this blog.

Fred Phelps is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.